Greg Wyatt writes: "I don’t trust Del Bigtree because I believe he (and others) have co-opted the legitimate grassroots “anti-vaccine” movement, and turned it into a more palatable and acceptable “Safer Vaccine Movement” or the “Vaccine Risk Awareness Movement”, as part of an elaborate controlled opposition campaign. This has been obvious to many of us for a long time, but for people who may be new to these concepts, I will lay out some of the basics.
This campaign is designed to take control of the legitimate opposition voice, which understands that all vaccines are dangerous, create new artificial boundaries as to what is and isn’t an acceptable level of resistance and dissent in the public discourse about vaccines, and silence and marginalize the informed and unjected – the real dissidents and the real health and freedom movement – people who understand that there’s no such thing as a safe vaccine."
The question is does he want to prevent SOME quackcine injury, or ALL quackcine injury? Injecting poisons cannot be made safer, yet that is what he campaigns for along with RFK Jr. and Steve Kirsch. They have all been captured the same way the FDA, CDC, etc has been captured.
It is, but we should seek the truth about matters so we can make an informed decision. If there is no threat from viruses, it makes the choice very simple.
That was excellent!! Thanks for sharing this. It made my day!! You rock!
Two decades for $200 billion: How teachers unions sold out our kids in the pandemic https://nypost.com/2022/09/01/how-teachers-unions-sold-out-our-kids-in-the-pandemic/
You need to Listen to this Interview. Period. Share it with your loved ones before this Fall's coming Medical Onslaught.
https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/shows/chd-friday-roundtable/xbPMqtMYgQ
Greg Wyatt writes: "I don’t trust Del Bigtree because I believe he (and others) have co-opted the legitimate grassroots “anti-vaccine” movement, and turned it into a more palatable and acceptable “Safer Vaccine Movement” or the “Vaccine Risk Awareness Movement”, as part of an elaborate controlled opposition campaign. This has been obvious to many of us for a long time, but for people who may be new to these concepts, I will lay out some of the basics.
This campaign is designed to take control of the legitimate opposition voice, which understands that all vaccines are dangerous, create new artificial boundaries as to what is and isn’t an acceptable level of resistance and dissent in the public discourse about vaccines, and silence and marginalize the informed and unjected – the real dissidents and the real health and freedom movement – people who understand that there’s no such thing as a safe vaccine."
https://gregwyatt.net/del-bigtree-exposed/
https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c/Viruses-Baileys-Cowan-Kaufman-Respond-To-Del-Bigtree:b
You could be right. Meanwhile, he's saved a LOT of people.
The question is does he want to prevent SOME quackcine injury, or ALL quackcine injury? Injecting poisons cannot be made safer, yet that is what he campaigns for along with RFK Jr. and Steve Kirsch. They have all been captured the same way the FDA, CDC, etc has been captured.
If you got wing-claw scratched by a bat proven to have rabies, what would you do?
100% fatality, 1 week to 8 mos to reach the brain. Then madness and death.
Just asking.
I'd rather take my chances of being scratched by a bat than be injected with poisons.
https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c/What-About-Rabies:a
https://viroliegy.com/2022/08/08/rabies-the-virus-of-fear/
Choice is key.
It is, but we should seek the truth about matters so we can make an informed decision. If there is no threat from viruses, it makes the choice very simple.