Good News for the Unvaccinated

A rolicking tale of college admissions, prison yards and a medical journal that refused to retract an accurate but inconvenient college kid's peer reviewed submission!

Imagine this.

You’re trying to impress your college admissions board with your analytical skills, so you crunch the covid vax “efficacy” number using some California prison yard comparative infection data, add a little woke chatGPT analysis, and voila!

You come out with a paper that concludes that vaccines offered zero to marginal help!

For the hell of it, and to add more weight to the college board submission material, you submit it to an up and coming medical journal, and they accept it for peer review.

A while later, it gets PUBLISHED!!!!!

Small problem though. The peer reviewer comments interpret the data as showing ZERO to negative efficacy.

Oh well, vive la différence. Right?

Well apparently not.

We can surmise that the college board (although hopefully massively impressed with a paper that shoots down their entire raison d'être of the past four years) puts not-so-gentle pressure on our college hopeful to “retract” the paper.

Long story short, the JOURNAL see’s no incorrect data, and therefore no basis for retraction.

Let’s hope the kid got in to college!

Learn more:

https://www.theepochtimes.com/article/journal-rejects-request-to-retract-study-suggesting-negative-covid-vaccine-effectiveness-5491435